The Danger of Science Denial

August 18th, 2010

After I blogged about my problems with the “health” side of self-help, I came across an excellent video by Michael Specter.  He talks about the dangers in denying science.  He expresses views similar to mine in that modern medicine (vaccines, etc) have saved lives and provide a higher quality of life.  I like the way he differentiates  between not liking something (Pharmacutical companies, the patent system, etc) and attacking the science itself (vaccines don’t work, etc.). Most people who disagree with the science use the former (the fears or dislike of something) to attack the latter.

Personally, I think a lot of these “debates” are manufactured in the marketing room.  Call me cynical but isn’t a little odd that people who push these “debates” are the same people who stand to make money from “alternative” treatments? Heck, the guy that went on trying to link autism and the MMR vaccine? Guess what? He just happneed to have his own “safe” vaccine ready. Of course, before that, he was trying to link the MMR vaccine to Chron’s disease.  It kills people? But it makes for great TV.

A couple of things I liked from the video:

1. Some things are not up for debate: vaccines save lives, genetically-engineered food can feed billions of people and most food we have now is “naturally” genetically-engineered.

2. People who don’t like Big Pharma instead jump in to the arms of Big Placebo.  A classic line!

Watch this and enjoy.

  • Pingback: Carlon Haas

  • Pingback: Tony Michalski

  • Pingback: Michel Fortin

  • Pingback: Mary E Ulrich

  • http://www.iqwirty.net Shannon Wagner

    You know, I used to think of the Big Bang Theory as one of those things that is not “up for debate”, but after seeing Morgan Freeman’s “Through the Wormhole” recently I came away thinking – jeez, so now there’s eleven dimensions.. and it’s just because that’s what they needed to make the equations work out?!?

    It was a humbling experience for me to question science. :-)

  • Anonymous

    Actually, I don’t think you’re questioning science.You can question a theory, but that’s what science is all about: questioning things and never saying something is absolute.

  • http://www.iqwirty.net Shannon Wagner

    Yeah, but the problem is I walked away with the feeling that the “theory” made about as much sense as the “theory” of Creation in 7 Days. I would honestly have trouble justifying one over the other. I think I’d better stick with the more practical science programs for a while..

    Anyway – thanks for doing your part to keep the debates alive!

  • Anonymous

    I think there is a big difference between the two. One of them offers proof, the other does not. I have no problem with people’s religious beliefs. In fact, this blog goes out of its way to NOT criticize religious beliefs.

    That being said, I think science is science and religion is religion. Nary the two shall mix. That’s why I get so annoyed that the “Law of Attraction” is presented as “scientific” when I think it is more spiritual in nature.

    Thanks for your contribution to DSP. Keep ‘em coming. I think I need to see “Through the Wormhole”.