3 Ways the Media Reports BS as Fact

July 29th, 2010

I don’t watch the news much.  Why? Because most of it is crap.  Half the time they don’t know what they’re talking about.  And since news is more and more about market share, reporting has turned into info-tainment.  Hence, a guy like Glenn Beck can get higher ratings than news programs and people think Jon Stewart is a legitimate source for news.

But never fear, newswatchers.  Part of my career was spent dissecting news articles.  So, I know how to spot BS and now you can too.  Here are 3 ways to spot it:

Some people say….

Some people say?  Who are those people?  Basically this phrase means “I can’t prove jack but I’ve got an opinion and I’d like to say it without letting you know it’s just my opinion.”

Some people say you’re a Communist.

Who are those people?

I don’t know…some people…you know, they send e-mails and stuff.

Some people say your news program sucks.

To me, it’s the same BS that the BS gurus pull with the “secrets they don’t want you to know.  Who are they? We’ll leave that up to your imagination.

Here is a thing about Fox News using this BS tactic.  But don’t for one minute think this is a Fox thing.  They ALL do it.  I hear it ALL THE TIME.  So, listen for it next time.

Mistakes were made…(why so passive?)

A writer knows there are two voices—the active and the passive.  Look at these sentences:

Jill burned the cake.

The cake was burned (by Jill).

One of those sentences completely lets Jill off the hook, while the other blames her.  Wanna know where a news organization stands on an issue?  Look where they assign blame in heir headlines.  Need an awesome example of the passive being used to take the blame off the speaker?  Here is this gem by former President George W Bush:

Lack of Context

Recently lack of context in “reporting” has been brought to the forefront with the whole Shirley Sherrod incident involving that blogger that I keep getting mixed up with Justin Bieber.  But the truth is this crap happens all the time.  How many times does the media put out crap without bothering to explain its context?  How many sound bites do you hear without wondering what was said afterwards? Do you even care?

Go on over to Media Matters.  They show clips of people on the right.  The clips can be informative, but I usually have no idea of what the context was.  Thus, the right looks unreasonable (and downright crazy)  in pretty much all the clips.  But sometimes when you view the whole clip, it doesn’t look so crazy anymore.

You can always tell when you’re being bullshitted when context is not provided.  In fact, whenever someone in the media expresses outrage over something another person has said, it’s best to ignore them.  They won’t give you the context to understand why something was said.  They don’t care.  It typically ruins their whole hour of ranting.

On the flip side, taking things out of context can be so much FUN!

A shoutout to the guys at Cracked for this awesome article that I read while researching media BS.

What Does it Mean to be Different? Review of Different by Youngme Moon

July 27th, 2010

“Different” by Youngme Moon is a book about brands and how to understand what makes one brand different from one another and how a company can become different.  Though this is by and large a business book, I found it changed the way I thought about being “different.”

And for full disclosure, I read this book right after the surprisingly disappointing Linchpin by Seth Godin, which was touted as a book about being different.  Unlike, Linchpin,  I found this book to be a good read that actually made me think about what we mean by “different.”

Moon argues that most businesses talk about being different but don’t do anything to be different..  What they think is “different” is really one of two things:

  1. Augmentation by addition: adding new features to a product
  2. Augmentation by multiplication: adding new lines of product: diet coke, coke with lime, cherry coke, etc.

When brands try to be “different” they really end up doing the same thing as everyone else.

In “Different”, Moon takes use trough different types of brands:

Reverse-positioned brands: brands that take away something you want but give you something unexpected, like JetBlue that takes away first class and round trip tickets but gives everyone leather seats and an entertainment center.

Breakaway brands: brands that re-categorize their brands as something else, e.g. Hugggies turned a diaper into a “pull-up”..

Hostile brands: brands that flaunt the fact that the brand is not for everyone, e.g. Hollister has only sizes 0-9

She uses these brand types to guide us to her main point: being different is not just a marketing tactic, it is a way of thinking.

The Good

I like the way Moon starts out the book.  She realizes that in words used to categorize brands they should not be taken as gospel.  They are just a starting point—a frame of reference—to start a conversation.

I wish more books said that.  Categories are merely heuristics to build a framework.  I wish more books (Ahem, Malcolm Gladwell!) would state this clearly instead of making people run around trying to fit something into a framework that doesn’t quite fit.

Moon is very clear that she is not trying to deliver the be-all-end-all of “difference.”  She is giving you a place to start.  And this book did get me thinking about what it really means to be “different” rather than just telling me that I or my business should be different.

The Bad

This book is not a rah rah book. It doesn’t give a bunch of platitudes about how great it would be if your business were “different.”  If you are looking for something to motivate you this is NOT that book.

I see this as good, but this “you can go it” style without substance is what passes for a lot of business books these days.

Different is nothing like that.   But I found it to be an easy read with plenty of case studies to illustrate the point.

The Verdict

Get the book!(affiliate link).  If you’re in business, it would be a good resource for you to think about your brand.  If you are just interested in the idea of being different and trying to figure out what difference really is, I think you will also find this book worthwhile.

Not convinced?  You can read an excerpt from the author’s site.

And you can view the cool video trailer for the book.

Twitter Weekly Roundup for 2010-07-24

July 24th, 2010

Wow…and all this time I thought #andrewbreitbart was that kid in the YouTube videos with Usher. # DSP Keyword of the day: "sham scammerschmidt" looks like my fake law of attraction coach is "attracting" attention http://bit.ly/do4gtY # DSP keyword of the day: "Eckhart Tolle stupid comments" http://bit.ly/ddQrUy # DSP Keyword of the day: "ask the [...]

5 More Meaningless Business Buzzwords

July 23rd, 2010

I’ve talked before about business jargon on more than one occasion.  But the worst offenders are the words and phrases that are completely meaningless.  What do I mean by “meaningless?” Here’s what I mean: I work in an international business setting.  We use English as the common language.  When these meaningless phrases come up, I [...]

Is it Better to be Lucky Than Talented?

July 22nd, 2010

Someone once asked me something interesting.  He said, “if The Secret’ and all this stuff is not real, then why do so many rich people endorse it?” I thought it was a good question.  So, here are two possible answers: 1. The “rich people” are the people who became rich selling Secret-related products 2. Rich [...]

Everything I Ever Needed to Know I Learned from Mr. Rogers

July 20th, 2010

Someone once asked me if I could “model” myself after anyone who would it be? After thinking about it, I said, “Fred Rogers.” Now, THAT got a laugh. But the reason is simple.  Fred Rogers did what most people dream of: he spent his life doing the things he loved and at the same time [...]